Abdul Rahiman, v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.33505 of 2014 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:- "...to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus direct the respondent No.1 to cause enquiry with regard to the interference of the respondent No.2 in calling the petitioner regularly to the police station without any reason and without registration of criminal case against the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and exceeding the powers vested with him and also voilative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no.2 not to call the petitioner to the police station, without any reason and without registration of criminal case against the petitioner and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3.

Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 placed on record the written instructions issued by the 2nd respondent-Station House Officer, Thirumalagiri Police Station, Secunderabad.

4.

From a perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that the 2nd respondent has no knowledge about the avocation, health condition and meeting with an accident on 25.09.2014 and the treatment availed in the hospital etc., in respect of the petitioner. As on the date of issuance of the instructions, no complaint of whatsoever has been registered against the petitioner with the 2nd respondent and he is not an accused or witness in any crime registered on the file of the 2nd respondent. Since the petitioner is a resident of Musheerabad, no rowdy sheet is opened or maintained in the 2nd respondent Police

Station. In these circumstances, there was no necessity for the respondent police to call him to the Police Station as alleged. It is also specifically mentioned that the petitioner was never called to the Police Station by the 2nd respondent or by his subordinates at any point of time. The petitioner has made all false and baseless allegations against the 2nd respondent in the present writ petition and sought enquiry by the Government.

5.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. ___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J 2nd January 2020 mar