High Court for State of TelanganaWP/18257/2015disposed of no costs

Mulastham Rajshekar v. The State Of Telangana,

2015-07-01Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.18257 of 2015 BETWEEN Mulastham Rajshekar and others.

... PETITIONERS AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. K. VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMN. MR. N. PRAVEEN KUMAR The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Petitioner states that he is the owner of an extent of Ac.0.06 guntas of

land in Sy.No.1401/A situated at Tulasinagar, Ward No.27, Jagtial Town, Karimnagar District. Alleging that the second respondent is laying a CC road through part of his land without initiating the land acquisition proceedings, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

2. The Commissioner/second respondent has filed a counter affidavit specifically stating that road work was called for vide tender notice dated 19.09.2014 for laying CC road in Sy.No.1399 and the work is already completed in the first week of June 2015. It is also stated that the second respondent has never encroached or laid road in Sy.No.1401/A and the road is laid only in Sy.No.1399 as per the revenue record and the municipality is not laying any new road. It is also stated that in future if the municipality wants to lay any road and if that affects the petitioner's land, the second respondent will initiate appropriate proceedings, but, as on today, there is no proposal to lay any new road.

3. In view of the said categorical statements, it is apparent that the petitioner's land is no way affected and as such, no further directions are called for.

The writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J July 1, 2015 DSK