← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/1602/2015disposed of no costs

Sri Vidyodaya Educational Society, v. C.Brinda Devi , C.Brunda Prasad

2015-06-05Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE FITH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1602 of 2015 BETWEEN Sri Vidyodaya Educational Society.

... PETITIONER AND C. Brinda Devi and another.

...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P. JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: --NONE APPEARED-- The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Petitioner, an educational society, represented by its Secretary had filed O.P.No.13 of 2012 before the Principal District Judge, Chittoor under Section 23 of the A.P. Societies Registration Act. The deponent herein states that he is Secretary of the petitioner educational society and seeks declaration of his status as Secretary and for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in the affairs of the said society. In the said OP, he also filed an application for temporary injunction ex parte vide I.A.No.21 of 2012. The said IA is stated to be pending and though notice was ordered as long back as on 18.01.2012, no orders are passed in the said IP. Hence, seeking consideration of the said IA the present revision is filed.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. It is evident from the narration above that the OP itself is pending from 2012 and after lapse of three years, it would not be just and proper to direct the Court below to take up and decide the interlocutory application and instead the interest of justice would be served by directing that OP itself be heard and disposed of as expeditiously as possible. The civil revision petition is, therefore, disposed of directing the learned Principal District Judge, Chittoor to fix a date for hearing the OP itself and hear and decide the same expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J June 5, 2015 DSK