Smt. T.S.Kasturi v. The Tahsildar, Chittoor Mandal Chittoor District.

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.35615 of 2015 ORDER:

Heard.

2. Petitioner states that she was granted house site patta several years back and constructed house and residing therein by paying taxes. Petitioner is aggrieved by the notice issued under Section 7 of the Act to her on 10-10-2015. Petitioner states that she had submitted detailed explanation dated 27.10.2015 alleging that the A.P.Land Encroachment Act, 1905 has no application and the said explanation was stated to be pending consideration before the first respondent. While so, apprehending that petitioner is likely to be dispossessed, she has approached this court by the present writ petition questioning the notice issued under Section 7 of the Act.

3. Since the petitioner had already submitted her explanation to the notice issued by the first respondent under Section 7 of the Act, the first respondent is directed to consider the explanation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, and take appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order. Till the said exercise is completed, the first respondent shall not interfere or dispossess the petitioner from the land covered by the impugned notice. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J November 2, 2015 Lmv