K.Vittal Reddy v. K.Narsimha Rao

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA SECOND APPEAL NO: 262 OF 20'14 Appeal Under Section 100 of C P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated dt.30/4/2013 as made in A.S.No.232 0f 2010 0n the file of the court of the vll Additional District and Sessions Judge, L.B.Nagar R.R.Distric Between:

60 years, Occ: Postman, K.Vittal Reddy, S/o K.Chandra Reddy, aged R/o Balanagar Township, Balanagar, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONEFYAPPELLANT AND K.Narsimha Rao, S/o Pochaiah, Occ: Service, Rl/o H.No.1-1 1-1 10/35, Shamlal Buildings, Begumbazar, HYderabad.

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT For the Appellant : Mr. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. K. V. SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

I{ON'BLE SMTJUSTICE I'.SREE SUDHA S.A.No.262 of 2014 UDG l'

\i7hen the matrer is raken up for hearing, learned counsel on either side reported rhat both the parties settled rhc matter outside the Courr.

In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infrrrcruous. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand ciose d.

SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOIyI FEGISTRAR (lD ,TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Vlll Additional District & Sessions Judge, L.B'Nagar'

2. The I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Cyberabad R.R. District.

3. One CC to Mr. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI, Advocate. [OPUC]

4. One CC to Mr. K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU, Advocate. [OPUC]

5. Two CD CoPies

6. One Spare CoPY SB k$o

HIGH COURT DATED:1710312022 1 $E S !-.{ \ q J3 [1 AU0 2072 v

JUDGMENT

\.*\.

9C SA.No.262 of 2014 DIMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS