Haneef Ali v. The State Of Telangana, Representated By

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.5747 OF 2015 PC: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Mr. C.V.R. Rudra Prasad, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.10, on instructions, submits that respondent No.10 - Society is not making or has made any construction or propose to make any construction as alleged in the writ petition. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.10, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy for redressal of their grievance, if the circumstances so demand.

Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. ______________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, J _______________________________ A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J

27-04-2015 ks