High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/4232/2016disposed of no costs

Atla Subbareddy v. The State Of A.P.

2016-03-29Raja Elango2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Criminal Petition No.4232 of 2016 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to release the vehicle of the petitioner i.e. TVS XL bearing Regd.No.AP 07 CE 2807 seized in Crime No.6 of 2015 by the Police, Karlapalam, Guntur District.

Heard and perused the material available on record. The petitioner herein filed a petition under Section 451 Cr.P.C. seeking release of TVS XL bearing Regd.No.AP 07 CE 2807 seized by the Police, Karlapalam in connection with the crime in Crime No.6 of 2015, for the offence punishable under Section 34(A) of the A.P. Excise Act. The learned Additional Junior Civil Judge - cum - Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bapatla, returned the said application, on the ground of jurisdiction. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal petition is filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and if the vehicle is kept idle for a long period, there is every possibility of it getting damaged. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to furnish sufficient surety and also produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor objects for the same since the vehicle is involved in a crime.

Considering these circumstances, it is directed that the vehicle i.e. TVS XL bearing Regd.No.AP 07 CE 2807, shall be released for interim custody of the petitioner, subject to final orders to be passed in the main case, on petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Additional Junior Civil Judge - cum - Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bapatla, and also on production of original R.C. book. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle, shall not change the physical features of the same

till the disposal of the criminal case and further the petitioner shall undertake to produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court. However, it is made clear that the present order will not stand in the way of any confiscation proceedings. If already confiscation orders are passed, the order need not be given effect to. With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________ RAJA ELANGO, J March 29, 2016.

KTL