Nemilikonda Yeshwanth v. Nemilikonda Tanuja And 3 Others

/ [ 32ee ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 114OF 2014 Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 rlw Section 401 of CrPC by the Docket Order dated:11-02-2012 passed in FCOP No.26 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Court, Adilabad. Between:

Nemilikonda Yeshwanth, S/o.Damodhar, Aged about 39 years, Occ: Presently Nil, R/o.Bazarhathnoor Village & Mandal, Adilabad District.

...Petitioner/Respondent

AND

1. Nemilikonda Tanuja, Wo.N.Yeshwanth, Aged 36 years, Occ: Household.

2. Nemilikonda Divakar, S/o.N.Yeshwanth, Aged 12 years, Occ: Student

3. Nemilikonda Pooja, D/o.N.Yeshwanth, Age 10 years, Occ: Student Respondent No. 2 & 3 being minors under the guardianship of respondent No.1, all are residents of Tatiguda locality of Adilabad Town, Adilabad Dist.

4. State of A.P rep by its Public Prosecutor, , r, .";X:t:H::';:"'"- .RespondenURespondent CRLRCMP. NO: 2'10 OF 2014 Petition under Section 397 (1) rlw 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the docket order and decree passed in FC.O.P.No.26 of 2009, dated 11-2-2012 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-Additibnal District Court, Adilabad, pending disposal of the CrlRC.

counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. L.SANDEEP, learned counsel representing MrS. SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: SRI GAJANAND CHAKRAVARTHI counsel for the Respondents No.4: Mr. VIZARATH ALl, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 114 oF 20L4 ORDER:

The present Criminal Revision Case is filed seeking to I t I I suspend the operation of the docket order and decree passed in F.C.O.P.No.26 of 2OO9 dated 11.O2.2O12 on the file of learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Court, Adilabad pending disposal of Revision.

2.

Heard Mr. L. Sandeep, learned counsel representing Mr. S. Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vizarath Ali, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State and Mr. Gajanand Chakravarthy, learned counsel appearing for unoflicial respondents. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties to the Revision have compromised the matter and no further orders are necessary in this Revision. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case as infructuous.

4.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel appearing for .the unofficial respondents takes no objection to the same.

l 5.

Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shal1 stand closed Sd/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// qrt SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Judge, Family Cou rt-cum-Add itional District Court, Adilabad (with records. if any)

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

3. One CC to SRI S. SURENDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to SRI GAJANAND CHAKRAVARTHI, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies kam 6k

HIGH COURT DATED: 0610712023 o tI T ,1 I (ii ).

) 1m [u$ g $ J \ 4 I t

ORDER

\, CRLRC.No.114 ot 2014 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS I Lb i\rx 1) g,t