Challari Anil Kumar v. The State Of Telangana,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.17051 of 2025 DATE: 22.12.2025 Between:
Challari Anil Kumar .... Petitioner/accused No.1 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through SHO, Balanagar.
.... Respondent/Complainant ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.1 seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.542 of 2025 of Balanagar Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 108, 85, 49 r/w 3(5) of the BNS.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant, who is the father of the deceased, lodged a report before the police stating that the marriage of the deceased was performed with accused No.1 and they were blessed with twins and one boy is not able to speak properly and on which her husband started harassing her mentally and physically and parents of accused No.1 provoked him to harass the deceased and on 13.10.2025, accused No.1 left the house to work and went to his brother's house without informing them. Due to the unbearable harassment of her husband, the deceased has killed her both the twins and she jumped out from their Apartment Terrace and died. Hence, he requested for necessary action. Basing on the same, the police registered a case for the above said offences. 3.
Heard Sri R. Prasanth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is husband of the deceased and the deceased is arrayed as accused No.2 and there are no such allegations to constitute the offence punishable under Section 108 of the
BNS and he is in jail since 14.10.2025 and the material part of the investigation was already completed and the offence punishable under Section 103(1) of the BNS is not applicable to the petitioner herein and it is only against accused No.2, who is already died and prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and the petitioner herein harassed his wife and he abetted his wife to commit suicide along with the children. Further, the investigation is not yet completed, as such, the petitioner is not entitled for the bail and prayed to dismiss this petition.
6.
Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel and the material on record, the petitioner herein is in jail since 14.10.2025 and whatever the allegations against the petitioner are that he abetted the deceased to commit suicide along with the children and as seen from the record, LWs 1 to 16 witnesses were already examined including the investigating authority. Considering the facts
and circumstances of the case and also the period of incarceration of petitioner in jail, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: i.
The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Nampally.
ii.
The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(2) of BNSS.
7.
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 22.12.2025 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.17051 2025 Date:22.12.2025 TU