Vikas Mahila Mandali v. The Southern Power Distribution Company Of T.S Limited,
[32521 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIV1BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 19370 OF 2015 Between:
Vikas Mahila Mandali, rep by its Secretary K.Lakshmi Devi Wo K.Nagaraju, aged about 62 years, Rio H.No.281lC, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad500 038. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The Southern Power Distribution Company of T.S Limited, Operation Circle, City North, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
2. Telangana State Housing Board, rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Nampally, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not providing electricity service connection to the petitioner premises situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue NOC for electricity service Connection and further direct the 1st respondent to provide electricity service connection to the petitioner premises. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 25044 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to provide electricity service connection to the premises of petitioner Mandali situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar without insisting NOC
from 2nd respondent or alternatively direct the 2nd respondent to issue NOC for electricity service connection pending disposal of the above Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI R.VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL Counsel for the Resoondent No.2: SRI BUCHI BABU, SC FOR TSHB The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA IURIT PETITION No.19370 of 2O15 ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication, any more.
2. Bringing the said submission on record, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed.. SD/-N.SR|HAR| ASSISTANT EGIST //TRUE COPY// :
l SE ON OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI P.GANGA RAMI REDDY, Advocate IOPUC]
2. One CC to SRI R.VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL [OPUC]
3. OneCCto SRI BUCHI BABU, SC FORTSHB [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies BsR y KKS
HIGH COURT DATED: 19101t12024 I I ( IHE SI4 14:
14 rEB 2[25 o \o .\
ORDER
l.u9 WP.No.1937tt of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS I / n tN