Parbez Ahmed v. The State Of Telangana,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.17271 of 2025 DATE: 29.12.2025 Between:
Parbez Ahmed .... Petitioner/accused No.32 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Through PS, Cyberabad Narcotics, TG-Anti Narcotics Bureau, Hyderabad.
....Respondent/Complainant ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/A.32 seeking enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No.01 of 2025 of Rachakonda Narcotics Police Station, TG-Anti Narcotics
Bureau, Hyderabad. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Section 8(c) 22(c), 27A, 27(a) and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').
2.
The case of the prosecution is that on reliable information that some persons are selling cocaine and Ecstasy Pills to the customers, the police conducted raid and seized the contraband of 150 grams of Cocaine and 1100 Ecstasy Pills from the possession of accused. As such, police registered the case against the accused for the above offences. During the course of investigation, the petitioner herein is also arrayed as accused stating that he is having contact with accused No.25, who is involved in Hawala transaction.
3.
Heard Sri Syed Hameed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 4.
The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and basing on one message, the petitioner is arrested and he is
in jail since more than six months and as on today, all the other accused were already granted bail. Hence, requested this Court to grant bail to the petitioner.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail stating that the allegations against this petitioner are serious in nature. However, he informed the Court that the charge sheet is not filed and prayed to dismiss this petition.
6.
In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioner was remanded to the judicial custody on 02.09.2025. As seen from the record, there is no charge sheet filed against the petitioner herein as on today even after lapse of 180 days and other accused were already granted bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner/A.32, subject to the following conditions:
i.
The petitioner/A.32 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of
Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judicial First Class Magistrate-cumV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District.
ii.
The petitioner/A.32 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner/A.32 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).
7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date:29.12.2025 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.17271 of 2025 Date: 29.12.2025 TU