Gundluri Bhaskar , Hyd., v. State Of Telangana, Rep Standing Councel, CBI, Hyd.,
[ 329e ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA i ATHYDERABAD SATURDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8941 OF 2014 Between:
Gundluri Bhaskar, S/o. Sri Subba Rayudu, Ryo. Janapriya Uthopiya Apartment, Block No.2, Flat No.22057, Second Floor, Aftapur, Hyderguda, Hvderabad.
..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 AND State of Telangana, Throu High Court at Hyderabad, gh CBl, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Standing Counsel, Hvderabad.
..RESPONDENT/COMPLANANT Cause title is amended as per the Court order dated 18.11.2023 in l'A No'2 of 2014(Crl.P.M.P.No. 17005 of 2O14) in Crl.P.No.8941 of 2014 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 13 of 2014 on the file of the Principal special Judge for cBl cases, Hyderabad to the extent of petitioner is concerned.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014 CRLPMP. NO: 8604 OF 2 't4l Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C_C.No.1 3/2014 on the file of the Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Crl'P. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P' NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Pinkeshwar Gangwar representing Ms. Ananthi, Special Public Prosecutor for cBl on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.8941 OF 2014 ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the , I proceedings against the petitioner/ accused No.2 in C.C.No.13 of 2Ol4 on the file of the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad (for short, "the trial Court"). 2.
Heard Mr. P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pinkeshwar Gangwar, learned counsel representing Ms. Ananthi, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-CBI 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the camse in the Criminal Petition does not survive as the C.C.No.13 of 2Ol4 has been disposed of vide judgment dated 23.01.2013 before the trial Court and no further orders are required in this Criminal Petition. To substantiate his contention, learned counsel filed a copy of e-courts proceedings. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition as infructuous.
4.
Learned Special Public Prosecutor takes no objection to the sarne.
a Z 5.
Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous' Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL AssrsTANr REGfTRAR '[ v SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Special Judge for CBI cases, Hyderabad.
2. The Station House Officer, Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad
3. One CC to Sri P. NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate [OpUC]
4. One CC to Ms. ANANTHI, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI [OpUC]
5. Two CD Copies b Nj //TRUE COPY// NS Ab
I HlGH GOURT I t t f I :
t1 DATED:1811112023 I $E. srAtr€'
, l( ( z
6) I ,\L * * I
ORDER
oo 1 2 JAN 2024 !
CRLP.No.8941 of 2014 DESPFJCHt'"- t.
DISMISSING.THEICRLP;
AS TNFRUCTUOUS .
i @)0{u ge=-- -o.\tVo