Nuthikatla Madhukar v. Yarlagadda Balaji

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH **** CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.1960 AND 2411 OF 2015 Between:

1.

Nuthikatla Madhukar.

And three others.

...PETITIONERS AND

1. Yarlagadda Balaji.

And two others.

...RESPONDENTS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments? Yes/No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.1960 AND 2411 OF 2015 COMMON ORDER:

CRP.No.1960 of 2015 is filed challenging the docket order dated 04.05.2015 in O.S.No.91 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial. CRP.No.2411 of 2015 is filed challenging the order dated 17.04.2015 in I.A.No.85 of 2015 in O.S.No.91 of 2013.

Heard both the counsel.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has given an undertaking that defendants' side evidence would be closed on or before 31.08.2015. In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am not inclined to go into the merits of the main case. Both the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of directing the petitioners/defendants to complete their side evidence on before 31.08.2015. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in both the revisions shall stand closed.

____________________ (T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J) 24th July 2015

Note: Issue CC by next week B/O RRB