Sanagari Gnaneshwar v. K Rajeswar Chari
[ 34431
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
FRIDAY,THE TWENW FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:7099 OF 2018 Petition under Sec 22 ol AP Buildings (LR&E) Act, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to bythe orderdated 31.08.2018 as made in i.a.NO. 20012016 lN R.A.No.4/2016 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, confirming the orders of the Learned Additional Rent Controller City Civil Court,Secunderabad as made in RC No.6l/2014 dated 3011112015. Between:
1. Sanagari GNANESHWAR, S/o. Late S.Brahmaiah, 45 years, Occ-Business, r/o. DoorNo. 3-3-168 and 169, Subash Road Near Bata, Secunderabad. PETTTTONER(S) AND K RAJESWAR CHARI, s/o. Late brahmachari, Aged 30years, occ- Pvt. Job, r/o. H.No. 1-3-101, Kalasiguda, Secunderabad ...RESPONDENTS t !A NO: { OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the certified copies of Bailiff Report, Panchanama and Docket order as Addl Material Papers in CRP No.7099 of 2018 to support the argument of petitioner in the interest of justice as prayed for and pass.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 31 .08.2018 as made in R.A.No. 412016 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad confirming the orders of the learned Additional Rent Controller, City Civil court, Secunderabad as made in RC No. 6112014, dated 30.11.
with a direction to redeliver the possession of the petition schedule property to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Revision. Counsel forthe Petitioner(s):SRl. J U M V PRASAD Counsel forthe Respondents: P SUDARSHAN RAO The Court made the following: ORDER
- THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NN{DIKONDA ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri J.u.M.v.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for further adjudication and it has become infructuous.
2.
Recording the said submission, the civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.* Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD'- M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TRUE GOPY// SECTION OFFICER To, l.TheAdditionalRentController,CityCivilCourt,secunderabad. z.TheAdditionarchiefJudge,citysmallcausescourt,Hyderabad
3. One CC to SRl. J U M V PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRl. P SUDARSHAN RAO Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD CoPies pk/psl % t. .
H-
HIGH COURT I l DATED:2411012025 t0R lHE S T4 o :;
? a tr|'t)lb e i1 DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
* o;,ATCT+,r:o -* GRP.No.7099 of 2018 pr-l t, I