Sangari Gnaneshwar v. K Rajeswar Chari

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ,, AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7098 OF 2018 Petition under Article 22 ot AP Buildings (LR & E) Act, Aggrieved by the Order dt.31.08.2018 as made in 1A.No.20012016 in RA.No.412016 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad. Between:

Sanagari Gananeshwar, S/o. Late S.Brahmaiah, 45 years, Occ. Business, r/o. Door No. 3-3-168 and 169, Subash Road Near Bata, Secunderabad.

...Petitioner/Appellant

AND K Rajeswar Chari, s/o. Late Brahmachari, Aged 3Oyears, Occ. Pvt. Job, r/o. H.No. 1-3-101, Kalasiguda, Secunderabad.

...Respondent

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Mr. J U M V PRASAD, Advocate Counselfor the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARS;IITG RAO I{AITDIKOITDA CML REVISIOI{ PETITION No.7O98 OF 2018 ( ORDE!R:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the civil revision petition does not srrrvive for further adjudication and it has become infrucLuous.

2.

ll.ecording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order irs to costs.

Ivliscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD'. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN tsT REGISTRAR ,ITRUE COPY'/ s TION OFFICER To,

1. The A'lditional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court' Hyderabad

2. One CC to Mr. K RAJESWAR CHARI, SECUNDERABAD [OPUC]

3. One CC to Mr. J U M V PRASAD' Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two C;D Copies W

HIGH C'CURT DATED: 2411012025 t THE S

ORDER

'!) 1 I lfl AB 202[ CRP.No.7098 of 2018 t * This Civil Revision Petition is Dismissed as lnfructuous.

v