Shaik Saleem, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.37 OF 2016 ORDER:

The petitioner/accused has preferred the present criminal revision case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.,) being aggrieved by the Order dated 06.11.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1976 of 2015 in C.C. No.196 of 2013 by the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chirala, wherein the learned Magistrate dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner herein seeking to discharge him in C.C.No.196 of 2013 arising out of offences under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Heard and perused the material available on record. After arguing for some time by the learned counsel for the petitioner, when this Court expresses its opinion that this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the Court below, he confined his arguments with regard to dispense with the presence of the petitioner before the Court below. Considering the nature of allegations and also as the question of identity of the petitioner/accused does not arise, the presence of the petitioner/accused before the trial Court is dispensed with except on the dates when the trial Court insists for his appearance.

The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly disposed of. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions pending in this petition, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 06.01.2016 pln