M. Avinash, v. The Government Of Telangana State,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 17843 OF 2014 Between:

M. Avinash, S/o. Venkaiah, Aged about 25 years, Occ: Business, Ri/o. H.No. 2-2110511, Flat No. 402, Swagruha Srilaxmi Apartments, Tilaknagar, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER AND 1 . The Government of Telangana State, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Govt., Prohibition and Excise, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise Department, Hyderabad

3. The Superintendent, Prohibition and Excise, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District.

RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned Gazette Notification No.40 dt: 25.06.2014 inviting applications for grant of 44 License to news shop at Ward No.112, Shop No.9 (Gazette Si N0.106), GHMC, Serilingampally. Ranga Reddy as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Gazette Notification No. 37 dt: 14.06.2014 and against the provisions of A.P. Excise Act, 1968, and the Rules called the A.P.

Excise (Grant of license of selling by shop and conditions of license) Rules, 2012) apart from being violative of Article 14 of Constitution of lndia and consequently to set aside the same. l.A.NO:1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 22373 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Gazette Notification No.40 dt: 25.06.2O14 issued by the 3rd respondent in respect of inviting applications for allotment of new 44 shop at Ward No.112, Shop No.9 (Gazette Sl No.106), GHI\,{C, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy, pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.B.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.17843 of 2014

ORDER

Sri Siripuram Kaumud, learned counsel representing M/s.Chandrasen Law Offices, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication by this Court and thus, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

3.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII 4.",<-- \ SECTIO FFICER To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. One CC to SRI.B.CHANDRASEN REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI

3. Two CD Copies

4. One spare copy S.A.

NN

HIGH COURT DATED:2110612022 HE. S Li ( .if .t.

ORDER

0 5 sEP ?t]?7 WP.No.17843 of 2014 \..

DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.