Vadthyavat Harshavardhan Nayak @ Harsha v. The State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO IHOUSAND AND TYVENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17694 OF 2025 Between:
Vadthyavat Harshavardhan Nayak @ Harsha, S/o Meghya Nayak, aged about 25 years, Occ. Auto driver, R/o Kanakapur Thanda Village, Moosapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, Telangana State, represented by his father Meghya Nayak S/o Vadthavath bojya Naik aged about 44 years, Occ. Auto driver, R/o Kanakapur Thanda Village, Moosapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, Telangana State ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.'18.
AND The State of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad through Station House Officer, Ameenpur Police Station, Sangareddy District ...RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner/Accused in the event of his arrest in FIR No.SB of 2025 U/s.318(4) BNS and Section 66 (D) of lT Act 2008 on the file of Ameenpur Police Station, Sangareoy District, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G BANDAIAH ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. Ganesh. the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Sole Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COI,'RT E]OR TI{E STATE OF TELAI{GANA AT
I{YDERABAI) THE HONOTJRABLE SMA. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRtrIiINAL PETITIOI{ No.17694 of 2025 DATE: 31.12.2025 Between:
Vadthyavat Harshavardhan Nayak Petitioner/accused No. 18 AND The State of Telangana, Through SHO, PS Bijnepally, Nagarkurnool District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
Respondent / De-facto Complainant ORDER:
l,earned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to u,ithdrau, the present Criminal Petition.
'2.
Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
3.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as u'ithdrawn.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall sta ncl closed.
Sd/- A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR iiTRUE COPY// 1o, SECTION OFFICER The Judiciar First crass Magistrate court at Sangareddy, sangareddy District 2.
5[:,1:loon,""al Judiciat First Ctass Magistrate at Wanaparthy. Wanaparthy
3. The SHO Ameenpur Police Station, Sangareddy District.
4. The SHO Papannapet Police Station, Medak District.
5. The SHO Gopalpet, Wanaparthy District.
6. One CC to SRl. G BANDAIAH Advocate IOPUC]
7. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI.
B. Two CD Copies PUPR &
HIGH COURT SKSJ DATED:31 11212025 liIE S <, \ C) ?
1F [tP 7,t26
ORDER
* CRLP.No.17694 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRL.PETITION AS WITHDRAWN 7\ )b