Pamu Geetha v. The State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 33031
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1001 OF 202s Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS against the order in D.V.c.No.7o 0t 2021 0n the file of the court of the ll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Vl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class. Between:
Pamu Geetha, W/o Sri Pamu Sudarshan, Aged about 36 years, Occ Housewife, R/o H.No.2-14-1 11, Beerappaguda, Uppal, Hyderabad. ...PEilTlONER(S) AND '1 . The State of Telangana,, Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court, at Hyderabad Forthe State ofTelangana at Hyderabad.
2. Pamu Sudharshan, S/o Late Sri P. Laxminarayana, Aged 37 years,- Occ Advocate, Rl/o H.No.12-2-338, Mallikarjuna Nagar' Nagole' Uppal, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the ll Addl. Junior civil Judge-cum-Vl Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First class to hear the D.V.C.No.70 of 2021 to grant interim maintenance to the petitioner herein forthwith pending disposal of the main Revision' Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. Lavanya rep. Sri K. Sai Krishna Mohan Rao Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE TITGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'TI) ,ANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SR.EENI\ AS RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.l00l of 1025 t t Date:30.12.2025 Between:
Pamu Geetha ..Petitioner AND The State ofTelangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, at Hyderabad, for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad and another.
.. Respondents
ORDER
When this Court raised a query about maintairt rbility of the revision petition, Ms.Lavanya, leamed @unsel representing Mr.K.Sai Krishna Mohan Rao, leamed counsel for I rc petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the pr,: ent criminal revision case with a liberty to avail the remedies as ar lilable under law 2.
Permission is accorded.
3.
[n view of the same, the criminal revision cas< is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty as sought for.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/. NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO DEPUW REGISTRAR it //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The ll Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Vl AdditidA Judicial Magistrate of First Class.
2. T;; CCs to the public prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
3. Ohe CC to Sri K. Sai Krishna Mohan Rao Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD CoPies VH/BA
HIGH COURT DATED: 3011212025 ,, /.'."(a =--HE il sa !
-?- . ) J( o 't ', , 619 i'fl,rc $ * il
ORDER
','Ct CRLRC.No.1001 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C.
AS WITHDRAWN q