Ramya Vuma, Balanagar., v. Dr.G.Ranjith Kumar, Nalgonda Dt And ANR.,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA FRIDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8301 OF 2015 Between:

1. RAMYA VUMA, BALANAGAR.,, Wo Pasoith Kumai Gunda Aio.30yrs, Occ. Household, Rl o. 7 4-231, Geetha Ngr-, Ferozguda, Balanagar. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSEO(S) AND

1. DR.G.RANJITH KUMAR, NALGONDA DT AND ANR,,, S/O. G. KTiShNAiAh, A,/a. 38yrs, Occ. Doctor, Rl/o H.No. 18-1344, Vysya Colony, Nalgonda District.

2. The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 437143814391482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the order passed in M.P.No. 185 of 2015 in M.-C.No.1Sli2O13 dated 3O-7-2O15 pending for the disposal on the file of the Honorable Family Judge, L.B Nagar, Ranga Reddy District and in consequentially allow the same.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLPMP. NO: 8319 0F 2015) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay the further proceedings in M.C.No.18112013 pending for the disposal on the file of the Honorable Family Judge, L.B Nagar, Ranga Reddy District including the presence of this petitioner till the disposal of this quash petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SUBRAHMANYAM KURELLA ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and Sri P.Veer Ra.ju, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.83O1 OF 2015 ORDER:

The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the order dated 30.07.2015 passed in M.P.No.185 of 2015 in M.C.No.181 of 2013 pending disposal on the frle of the Court of learned Family Judge, L.B. Nagar, Ralga Reddy District. 2.

Heard Mr. Subrahmanyam Kurella, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Muniraj, learned counsel representing Mr. P. Veerraju, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. Vizarath Ali, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive and no further orders are required in this Criminal Petition. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition as infructuous.

4.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 concedes to the said request.

5.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes no objection to the same.

i.T a 6.

Recording the submissions made by all the learned counsel, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. sd/- c.PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGI //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Family Court Judge, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District'

2. One CC to SRl. SUBRAHMANYAM KURELLA, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. P. VEERRAJU, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CCs the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State Of Telangana, Hyderabad [OPUC] . Two CD Copies $"-

HIGH COURT DATED:O311112023 S TA 1rE q ?

J z I o o o

ORDER

l'l I r.i CRLP.No.8301 of2015 * * D CI Es b P DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS ]NFRUCTUOUS ' :,.

\)e4 >q t