← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/38642/2018disposed of as infructuous

Smt.Vuppala Rajya Lakshmi v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-11-01C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy,P.Keshava Rao3 pages

The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy and The Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Keshava Rao Dated 1st November, 2018 Between:

Smt.Vuppala Rajya Lakshmi

...Petitioner

and The Inspector of Police, SR Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad and 3 others ... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner:

Mr.G.Suresh Goud Counsel for the respondents: GP attached to Addl.AG (TS) This Court passed the following:

CVNR, J & PKR, J Dt: 01-11-2018 Order: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed for issue of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the petitioner's son viz., V.Rajkiran (for short 'the alleged detenu') before the Court and set him at liberty.

At the hearing, the learned Government Pleader representing the learned Additional Advocate-General for the State of Telangana, on instructions, submitted that the alleged detenu is accused in Crime No.589 of 2018 of Sanjeevreddy Nagar Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376-D & 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956; that he was arrested on 25-10-2018 and produced before the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, who remanded him to judicial custody; and that presently, the alleged detenu is lodged in Chenchalguda Central Jail.

Mr.G.Suresh Goud, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the Police have illegally detained the alleged detenu in different spells and that the last time he was detained was on 22-10-2018 after he was apprehended in GVK Mall, Banjara Hills.

CVNR, J & PKR, J Dt: 01-11-2018 With the arrest and production of the alleged detenu before the jurisdictional magistrate and his subsequent remand, the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. If the petitioner or the alleged detenu is aggrieved by the alleged illegal detention prior to such arrest, they shall be free to avail appropriate legal remedies available to them in law.

Subject to the liberty given as above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.

As a sequel, IA.No.1 of 2018, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) ________________ (P.Keshava Rao, J) Dt: 1st November, 2018 lur