Mutyalama v. The State Of Andrha Pradesh Rep. By It Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN

Present

Between:

Mutyalama, W/o. Jappanna, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Field Assistant, R/o. Bondom Village, Arakuvalley Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

.. Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principle Secretary, Department of Rural Development A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad & 2 others .. Respondents The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioner is that though a proposal is made by the Mandal Parishad Development Officer to appoint the petitioner, the petitioner is not appointed in Arakuvelly Mandal.

2. When the matter is taken up, learned Special Counsel representing the 2nd respondent reports to the Court that selections were finalized and another person is appointed as Field Assistant on 26.11.2016. Since the post of Field Assistant in Arakuvelly Mandal is already filled up, no direction as sought for in the writ petition can be granted.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any such appointment, he shall work out his remedies as available under law. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

_____________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 9th February, 2016 KL

Date: 9th February, 2016 KL