Surugula Ramesh v. The State Of Telangana, Represented By Its Principal Secreta

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE S.V.BHATT W RI T PETI TI ON No.3 2 2 3 3 of 2 0 1 6 ORDER:

Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao, counsel for petitioners, requests the Court to permit the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue remedy afresh in accordance with law. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by granting liberty as prayed for. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ S. V. BHATT, J October 18, 2016 DSK