Mr.G.Srinivas Goud, R.R.Dt., v. State Of Ap., Rep. Pp And ANR.,

13217 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2736 OF 2014 Between:

[\4r. G. Srinivas Goud, S/o. Late Mr.G.Rajaiah, Government Service, R/o. Plot No. 160, C Block, Sree Ram Nagar Colony, Kondapur, R.R.District.

...Petitioner/Accused No.2

AND 'l . The State of Andhra Pradesh, through the Public Prosecutor, ...RespondenUComplainant

2. Mrs. K.P.Manasa, D/o. Mr.K.Prakash, W/o. tt/r.G.Krishna, Housewife, R/o. H.No. 11-14-138, Plot No. 18, J.P.Garden, Haripuri Colony, Saroornagar, Hyderabad - 500035 ...RespondenU De-facto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings under the FIR bearing Crime No. BB7 of 2013 on the file of the Madhapur PS., Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District as being illegal, arbitrary and vitiated by the errors apparent on the face of record. CRLPMP. NO: 2480 OF 2014 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in the FIR bearing Crime No. 887 of 2013 on the file of the Madhapur PS., Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District including arrest of the petitioner herein.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri B. Shashidhar, Advocate for the petitioner and the Assistant public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No.2736 OF 2014 ORDER:

Heard.

2. In response to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner dated 10.10.2022, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the First Information Report had been closed AS there was compromise between the parties.

3, Having regard to this position, as no cause survive for adjudication. this petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

I SD/- K.SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// qb \ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The lX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, at Miyapur, Hyderabad.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangan at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. The Station House Officer, P.S. Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District.

4. One CC to Sri B. Shashidhar, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy GJ =sy

HIGH COURT \ DATED:1311012022 Z.

1ttE STA)-

ORDER

B I Ji\l: ?i CRL.P.No.2736 of 2014 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS f>- I