← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/17770/2025allowed no costs

Suraj Bachhar, v. The State Of Telangana

2026-01-05K. Sujana5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.17770 of 2025 DATE: 05.01.2026 Between:

1. Suraj Bachhar

2. Rupa Dhali .... Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 & 2 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad .... Respondent/Complainant

O R D E R

This criminal petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No.322 of 2025 of Saroornagar Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').

.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that on 06.12.2025, on reliable information, the de-facto complainant conducted an inspection and found accused Nos.1 and 2 in possession of contraband and seized 3.008 Kilograms of dry ganja. Basing on the same, a criminal case was registered against the accused for the alleged offences and were arrested on 06.12.2025.

3.

Heard Sri D. Suryanarayana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent of the allegations and have been in judicial custody since 06.12.2025 and that the contraband allegedly seized from the possession of the petitioners i.e., 3.008 kilograms of dry ganja, falls under the category of intermediate quantity and the material part of investigation is already completed and further detention of the petitioners is unwarranted. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioners by allowing this criminal petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, contending that although the seized contraband falls under the category of intermediate quantity, the investigation is still ongoing and has not yet been completed. Therefore, granting bail to the petitioners, at this stage, does not arise. However, he informed the Court that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

6.

Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is observed that the seized contraband i.e.,3.008 Kgs of dry ganja falls under the category of intermediate quantity and the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 06.12.2025, and a substantial portion of the investigation has already been completed. In view of these circumstances, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar.

ii.

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioners shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 05.01.2026 SS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.17770 of 2025 Date: 05.01.2026 SS