← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/39067/2017dismissed as infructuous

K. Kumara Swamy v. Secy., M.A. And U.D. Dept. And Ano.

2023-11-02Laxmi Narayana Alishetty4 pages

[ 3383 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION NO: 39067 OF 2017 Between:

K. Kumara Swamy, S/o. Hanumanlu, Aged qboy! 5J, years, ..Occ Working. as Uunicipat Commidsioner Grade lll, Sanga Reddy Municipality, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District.

...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana , rep by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ihe Director <if Munlcipal Administration, State of Telangana, A.C.Guards, HYderabad ...RESP.NDENT'

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not concluding the disciplinary proceedings vide charge lMemo in G.O.Rt.No.608 dated 08.09.2016 (Allegations relates to November 2014) as void, illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Municipal Commissioner Grade ll on par with juniors with all consequential benefits l.A. NO: 1OF 20'17 (WPMP. NO:48456 oF 20171 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Municipal commissioner Grade ll without reference to pendency of

disciplinary proceedings vide charge l\Iemo in G.o.Rt.No.60B dated 08.09.2016 (Allegations relates to November 2014) pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S. JAGADISH Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR MCpL ADMN-URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRJ JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITIoN NO. 39067 0F 2017 ORDER:

Mr.S. Jagadish, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the petitioner retired from service and thus cause does not survive in the writ petition. Therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

2.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if petition, shall stand closed.

any, pending in this writ SD/- C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT R IS //TRUE COPY// FFICER To,

1. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

2. One CC to SRl. S. JAGADISH, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies Btu GJP SECTI +

.f HIGH COURT DATED:0211112023 1 e STAI€ ,.< pl o .b (.) a?

* .!

t Dfsn^ rc"

if 15 N0\ ?t21

ORDER

WP.No.39067 of 2017 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS @q'& tu