Mittapalli Prakash v. The State Of Telangana

432511

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1 1483 0F 2018 Between:

Mittapalli Prakash,. S/o Rajamallaiah, Occ. Business, R/o. Doctors Colony, Miryalaguda Town Nalgonda District.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

2. The Miryalaguda Municipatity, Rep. by its Town planning Building Overseer Viz., G.Pavani, Wo. Ramakiishna Ag-ed about years, R/i.Miryaliguaa. RESPONDENT/GOMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of CI.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in c.c.No. 7l of 2014 on the file of the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Miryataguda, registered U/Sec. 209, 210,211,216, 340 and 360 of A. P.Municipalities Act, 1965 as against the petitioner herein l.A. NO: 1OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.

77 of 2014 on the file of the First class Judicial Magiskate at Miryalaguda, pending disposal of the above criminal petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T RAJINIKANTH REDDY, Advocate for the petitioner and the public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.

I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.11483 of2O18 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ,Cr.p.C.,) to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.77 of 2Ol4 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Miryalaguda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 2O9, 2LO, 2ll, 216,340 and 360 ofthe A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition.

3.

Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

4.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sha stand closed sd/ v. KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGIST(AR / ,/TRUE COPY// sEcroN &rr"r* To,

1. The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Miryalaguda 2 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to SRl. T RAJINIKANTH REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies ADI( PSR s

HIGH COURT DATED:1711012023 e slATE OF ( o a* \\t\ l_u LU'-"

tr:co

ORDER

i r o[s? A1 CRLP.No.11483 of 2018 DISMISSING THE CRLP AS WITHDRAWN (Dor'

16 \t a3