B.Venkateshwarlu v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SEETHARAMA MURTI Writ Petition No.38876 of 2017 ORDER:

This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking verbatim the following relief:

" ..to issue appropriate Writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.3 in not renewing the Fitness of the petitioners vehicles in spite of their repeated requests is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to renew the fitness of the petitioners vehicle at the earliest and to pass such other order or orders appropriate in the case."

2.

Heard Smt. M.Shalini, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.

3.

At the hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this matter is squarely covered by the orders, dated 06.04.2017, of this Court passed in W.P.No.9570 of 2017.

4.

The operative portion of the order, dated 06.04.2017, reads as under:

" .....the Writ Petition is allowed directing the respondent authorities to allow the petitioners forthwith to submit their applications through online and process the same as expeditiously as possible and complete the testing formalities within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. However, it is made clear that the respondent authorities may take action against the petitioners for furnishing the alleged fake addresses and getting their vehicles registered, in accordance with law."

MSRM, J W.P.No.38876 of 2017 5.

Following the above said order; and, for the reasons as were mentioned in the afore-stated order, this Writ Petition is allowed directing the respondent authorities to allow the petitioners forthwith to submit their applications through online and process the same as expeditiously as possible and complete the testing formalities within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. However, it is made clear that the respondent authorities may take action against the petitioners for furnishing the alleged fake addresses and getting their vehicles registered, in accordance with law. Office is directed to enclose to this order, a copy of the order, dated 06.04.2017, passed in W.P.No.9570 of 2017. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J 17th November, 2017 RAR