B.V.Kullayappa, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * WRIT PETITION No. 31736 of 2015 BETWEEN B.V.Kullayappa ... PETITIONERS AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...RESPONDENTS Date of Order pronounced: 30.09.2015 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether his Lordship wish to see the Yes/No fair copy of the Judgment?

ORDER:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

2. This writ petition is directed against the notice issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), third respondent, dated 14.08.2015 in an appeal preferred by the fifth respondent. Petitioner questions the entertainment of appeal, primarily, on the ground that he has purchased the said land on payment of market value and as such he acquired the ownership of land and cannot be treated as an assigned land.

3. Even if that be so, it is open for the petitioner to approach the third respondent, raise all his contentions, and defend his claim in the said appeal. If the petitioner raises any such contention, there is no reason to doubt that the third respondent would not deal with the said contention and would not decide the matter in accordance with law. I have no reason to entertain the writ petition against the said notice. With the liberty aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J September 30, 2015 LMV