Marisetti Kondaraju, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION NO.11299 of 2015 Between:

Marisetti Kondaraju PETITIONER AND 1.

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, and others. RESPONDENTS

ORDER:

The case of the petitioner is that he purchased a total extent of Ac.2.94 cents in Sy.No.199 of Divil Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District under two registered sale deeds dated 23.06.2014 and 26.09.2014 from one Sri Devada Rami Reddy, and since then he is in possession and enjoyment of the said property. He made an application dated 29.12.2014 to the 3rd respondent for mutation and for issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds. Complaining that though almost 75

working days have elapsed the 3rd respondent did not take any action, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue (A.P.) for respondents.

As per Section 4 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 any person acquiring by succession or survivorship or inheritance or by partition or by way of a decree from a Court any right as owner, pattadar, mortgagee, occupant or tenant of a land, shall intimate, in writing, his acquisition of such right to the Mandal Revenue Officer within 90 days from the date of such acquisition and then, the Mandal Revenue Officer shall give an acknowledgment of the receipt of such intimation. Thereafter, under Section 5 of the said Act, the Mandal Revenue Officer shall determine as to whether and if so, in what manner, the record of rights may be amended in consequence of the Application made and carry out the necessary amendment in the record of rights in accordance with such determination.

It will also be appropriate to notice that Rules were also framed in 1989 for giving effect to the provisions of the Act. As per Rule 9, after due completion of enquiry, the recording authority shall pass orders in respect of cases requiring change of registry necessitated by succession, when it is not disputed. Form VI (A) is prescribed as the proper form for indicating intimation of acquisition of rights in terms of Section 4 of the Act, as per sub-rule (2) of Rule 18 of the Rules. Considering the fact that the petitioner has filed necessary application in the prescribed format, I deem it appropriate to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the applications dated 29.12.

2014 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from today.

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.

21st April, 2015 Js.