Rajesh Rawtani Alias Raj Dixit v. Smt. R.Pramila Bai,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G, SRI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1282 OF 2014 PetitionunderArlicle22TofConstitutionoflndia,againsttheorder dated.26.03.2014 made in 1.A.No.69',1 0l 2014 in o.S.No.477 0f 2013 0n the file of the Court of the ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad' Between:

Raiesh Rawtani Alias Ra.i Dixit, s/o Ramchand Rawtani Occ: Business' R/o 'r]it""] nz.'plli No*ro, rr,lu"jJera Residency, Journalist colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

... Petitione r/Res Ponde nt No'1 AND Smt R. Pramila Bai, W/o. Late Balkishan Singh' Occ: Housewife' R/o Plot No' ;G,"Drr";;;i;;; coro"v -crn'io.rt in"riu", T"rimulsherry' Secunderabad-500 015.

tvlahesh Sinqh, Sio. Late Balkishan Singh' Occ:,Business R/o Plot No'16 ' - ii;;s'r""t;# ill ;; G;; R;;k -r n C ia ve,i ri m ul s he rrv' Sec u nd e ra ba d - 5 00 0 1 5 B.V. Raiesh Singh, S/o Late Balkishan Singh' Occ: Business' R/o Plot No 16' Br"q!ii? cliol-]v, crn no;IE"tit""' iiiriuigherrv' Secu nderabad-soo 0 1 5' tvt a h es h Rawta n i, s/o. Ra m cha nd Rawta n i., .occ: " t' t"t::::t :::t-ltJ:lI ;;i'Efi:rH/r'6'zle, nouJ No. 1, Banlara Hills' Hvderabad' Viiav Rawtani, S/o. Mahesh Rawtani, Occ: Business',R/o 6-3-348/8 1201lA and 615-'diiio))4, noao rlo. 1, Banjara Hills' Hvderabad' ...RESPONDENTS t.A. NO: 1 0F 2014(CRPMP, NO: 1784 oF 20 14) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedingsino.SNo.

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI sIVIL REVISION PETITIoN NO.1282 0F 2014 ORDER:

Learned counsel lor the petitioner u.ould submit that lhe r:aLrse in this revision does not surlive lurthcr adjuclication ancl thc l-c\ isiot.) It:rs i>cconte infructttorts.

ll tltirt vi(,\\.o1'1l.rl rnit t,r-. r-r,corclinq tltt- s:rirl suLrrnission. tltt. cir il lle'rsi.n Pt'titio, is clis,issecr as ini-uctu.r-rs. Trrcr-c srrirll rr.' rto oirlct :ts to costs.

X,l isccllzt neou s applications, il. an-1., prr.rclrnn sh:rll srrrrrcl dismissed.

SD/. I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGI iiTRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To

1. The ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court' at Hyderabad (With Records)

2. One CC to Sri T. Natraj' Advocate [OPUC] t. o;; cc to Sri Eathakoia venkata Rao, Advocate [oPUc] ;. o;; cc to sri M. s. R. Subrahmanyam, Advocate IOPUC]

5. Two CD CoPies

HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:31 11212020 1 trE gr4Ic oo 2 0 JAU ?c?1 l) -,'., Jt '-l: l.'"-'

ORDER

CRP.No.1282 of 2014 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS L c )/