Tanniru Subba Rao v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Date :3.11.2016 Between :

Tanniru Subba Rao S/o Ranga Rao R/o D No. 20-9-48 Near Kanyakaparemeswari temple Etukuru road, Sangadigunta Guntur Petitioner And The State of A P Rep by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration Department Secretariat, Hyderabad and others Respondents The Court made the following:

ORAL ORDER:

Complaining that even though valid building permission is granted, employees of second respondent are interfering with the construction activity and not allowing the petitioner to undertake the construction, this writ petition is filed.

Except making vague averments, no material is brought on record to show that there is serious interference by the officers of the respondent municipal corporation, contrary to the building permission granted. On instructions, learned standing counsel for respondent municipal corporation submits that allegations made are wrong and no officer of the municipal corporation is interfering with the construction activity and no coercive action will be taken without following the due process. Having regard to the said submission of the learned standing counsel and since no material is brought on record to show that there is interference, writ petition is premature and accordingly the same is dismissed. No costs. Having regard to the same, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending are closed. ______________ P NAVEEN RAO,J DATE:3.11.2016 TVK

Date :3.11.2016