Habeeb Abdul Rahman v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.10215 OF 2017 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A3 of P.S.Mailardevpally, Cyberabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471, 506 r/w 34 IPC and also heard the learned public prosecutor, representing the 1st respondent - State, before ordering notice to 2nd respondent and perused the grounds urged in the quash petition and the contents of the FIR and though his name is not there, there is a disclosure of A1 about his complexity also, though it is pointed out by the learned public prosecutor, from the material on record, the counsel for petitioner submits that it is a false implication. It is premature much less to interdict the investigation there from but for to say, none of the offences are punishable above seven years, in the event of any necessity of the arrest of the petitioner, the police shall strictly follow Section 41A of Cr.P.C. and the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar1.

3.

Accordingly and with the above direction, this criminal petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed in consequence.

______________________________ DR.B.SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 27.10.2017 SS 1 2014 (5) SCC 324