Jumaadi Vishwanath v. The State Of Telangana
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.11851 of 2018 ORDER :
The petitioners are A.1 and A.2 in C.C.No.390 of 2018 on the file of the II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mancherial, out come of the report of the 2nd respondent-de facto complainant, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 IPC by the Station House Officer, Mancherial Police Station. 2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners before ordering notice to the 2nd respondent and learned Public Prosecutor, representing State-1st respondent and perused the material on record. 3.
A perusal of the First Information Report and police final report no way requires interference for this Court, but for to say the petitioners are at liberty to move the trial Court by filing any application for discharge if no case made out from perusal of Part-II Case Diary before the trial Court to decide from the prosecution material. Needless to say from the difficulty expressed to attend personally both the accused, they are given liberty to file application under Rule 37 of Criminal Rules of Practice, for the trial Court to hear and allow with necessary conditions for one to represent the others. 4.
With the above observation, the criminal petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 8th November 2018.
mar