Shabuddin v. State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOi745 oF 2016 Crl.Revision Case Under Section 397 & 401 of Crl.P.C. 1973 against the Docket Order dated 10-02-2016 in C.C. No. 426 ol 2011 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Govarikhani. Between:

Ragala Ramanand @ Komalla Kanakaiah, S/o. Elaiah, Occ: Employee in SC.Co.Ltd., Rio, H.No, 9-7-217, Vittal Nagar, Beside Amaravathi School, Godavarikhani (lvl), Ramagundam, Karimnagar District.

...PETITIONER/ Complainant AND '1 . The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the state of Telangana and the state of AP.

2. Diddi Laxman, S/o. Rajnarsu, employee in SC.Co., Ltd., R/o. H.No. '14-1-288, Bhagat Singh Nagar, Godavarikhani (M), Ramagundam, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENT/ Accused Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESHWAR VARANASI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI VIDYASAGAR AKKAPAKA The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMlNAL REVISION CASE NO.745 0F 2016 ORDER:

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State would submit that the cause in this Criminal Revision Case does not survive for further adjudication and the criminal Revision case has become infructuous.

In that view ol the matter, recording the said submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous' Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending sha1l stand d ismissed .,,-ts.54H*$,tt?HXA I/rRuE coPY/'

\ 'ecrrKrrcrn i: +m *sll [Ti:'t1'j.::5i:?l fi *i'sf*"':?i[!Tii53? Ti*fl?t?f xi"

r' Advocate ro P U cl i b,"[%ti} Siitit***s H*AR 'ARANAS

4. One CC to SRI' DYASAGAR AKKAPAKA' Advocate [OPUCI q Two CD CoPies

6. on. SPare coPY KUL TP "\

HIGH COURT DATED: 081061202,1 1 e s rAra o i 24 jut l A'

o \\r t DESp/iIC

ORDER

CRLRC.No.745 of 2016 DISMTSSING THE CRL.RC AS INFRUCTUOUS .-\$ b