Kailash Engineering Enterprises v. Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR C.M.A. NO: 1210 OF 20'18 Appeal under Section 37(1) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, against the Judgment/ decree in Arb.OP No.207 of 20ffi daled 0410712018 on the file of the Court of the XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad. Between:
Kailash Engineering Enterprises, Plot No.136, Netaji represented by lts lVanaging partner, Sekhar Chodagam Nagar, Kapra, Hyderabad - ,..APPELLANT/PETITIONER AND
1. Union of lndia, represented by General lVlanager, South Central Railway O3'd floor, Rail Nilayam, Secundrabad -500025
2. Chief Signal ahd Telecom Engineer (projects), South Central Railway 7th floor, Rail Nilayam, Secund rabad -500025
3. Deputy Chief Signal and Telecom (Proj), Divisional office, Vijayawada Div, South Central Railway, Vijayawada -520001 ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS For the Appellant : MS PRIYA IYENGAR, Advocate For the Respondents : SRI C.V.RAJEEVA REDDY, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGI\IENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAC) AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T"VINOD KUMAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.1210 0F 2018 J DGMENT:
(Per Sri Justice M.S.Ranachandra Rao) Leamed counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents state that the matter is settled out of Couft. 2, Recording the same, the Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
3.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this CMA shail also stand disn.rissed.
Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR N/'
,TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To 1.
2.
a i4.
Ixt The XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Secunderabad. One CC to IVls. Priya lyengar, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri C.V.Rajeeva Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies l${}
HIGH COURT i DATED:1910212021 ', TAI€ S Z ( o L) t* 17 YrAR 2021 ( -b * i
ORDER
CMA.No.1210 of 2018 DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS.
z\