Shivanna, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE S.V.BHATT W RI T PETI TI ON No.3 7 4 2 1 of 2 0 1 6 ORDER:

Petitioners complain against inaction of respondents in removing unauthorized constructions allegedly made by seventh respondent in Sy.No.119 (Grama Kantam) of Bujnoor village, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District as illegal and unconstitutional. 2.

On 30.11.2015, a representation was made to second respondent as well as third respondent for appropriate action. Now the complaint is that respondents have neither moved in the matter by conducting enquiry nor removed the unauthorized construction in the subject matter of the writ petition. 3.

Mr. G. Seshadri, standing counsel for sixth respondent, submits that the sixth respondent will verify the veracity of complaint in the representation dated 30.11.2015 and if construction is made without permission by seventh respondent, the same will be attended to and appropriate orders passed in accordance with law. 4.

The statement is placed on record. The sixth respondent is directed to do the needful within eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is needless to mention that this Court has not considered the merits and opportunity as required by law is given to sixth respondent as well.

The writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________ S. V. BHATT, J November 2, 2016 DSK