High Court for State of TelanganaWA/111/2022disposed of as infructuous

Mr. Mohd Sayeeduddin v. The State Of Telangana

2022-02-17Abhinand Kumar Shavili,Satish Chandra Sharma3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT APPEAL NOi 111 OF 2022 Writ Appeal under Clause '1S of the Letters patent Appeal preferred against the order dated 30.01.2015 passed in Wp No..i327 of 2015 on the fite of the High bourt. I Between:

L4r. [/]ohd Sayeeduddin. S/o N,4ohd Jamaluddin, prop. perfect Watch. Aoed about 37 years. Occ. Business. C/o Premises No.8-1-423, Rp Road, SecunOe'raOJ"-' ...APPELLANT AND

1. The State of Telangana. Rep by the principal Secretary. lvlunicipal Admtnistralton, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Greater Hyderabad l\,4unicipal Corporation. Rep. by Commissioner and 5pecrat Ufltcer, Iankband, Hyderabad.

3. The Deputy Commissioner, GHIVC, Circle No..18, Secunderabad Division, Secunderabad.

4. Assistant City Planner, GHIvlC, Circle No.1 B, Secunderabad Division, Secunderabad.

5 f y Ranyegr, S/o Veereshwar Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Business, Ryo H.No.1-i0-63/1/1, Matoshree Cheekoticardens, eegumpbt, HvOerJnaO.-' " - ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI WASIM AHMEO KHAN Counsel for the Respondent No..t: cp FOR MUN|CIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: Smt.A DEEPTHI, SC for GHMC The Court delivered the following:

THE HON'BLE THE CITIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND TIIE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SI{AVILI @ JUDGMENT: lPet the Hor'bte the chief Justice satishchdndra shatn4 Learned counsel has fairly stated before this Cor-rrt that the present writ appeal has become infnrctuous'

Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions' if any' shall stancl closed' There shall be no order as to costs'

sD/-MrvuAYA EE|I?[I[ qih //TRUE COPY// SECTI,bN OFFICER To, \ & Urban Dev High Court for the State of Two CCs to the GP for Municipal Admn'

TJlansana [OUTI Advocate IOPUCI One CC to SRI WASltr'4 AHMED KHAN'

MC [oPUC] One CC to Smt A'DEEPTHI' SC for GH

4. Two C.D. CoPies'

5. one SPare CoPY'

MRC \ \"

HIGH COURT DATE D:1 7 10212022

JUDGMENT

{ E SIArE ( WA.No.111 ot 2022 0o lPa o , * a.?

OEg r' ..-:.:11 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @%* .tFv