← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/35324/2017disposed of no costs

M.Mallikarjuna Rao v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

2017-10-25S.V.Bhatt2 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION NO.35324 of 2017 ORDER:

The petitioner complains against inaction of 4th respondent in looking into the report forwarded by 3rd respondent to 4th respondent. Crime No.45 of 2014 is registered under Section 107 of Cr.P.C. According to the instructions of 3rd respondent, the report has been forwarded to 4th respondent and it is for the 4th respondent to ac t in the matter. The averments in the affidavit are to the effect that the 4th respondent is not taking final decision in this behalf. Hence, the writ petition.

Heard the counsel and perused the record.

I am satisfied, keeping in view the limited prayer, the writ petition can be disposed of by this order.

(a) The petitioner is given liberty to represent to respondents 3 and 4 by enclosing a copy of this order within two weeks from today.

(b) Respondents 3 and 4 are directed to take decision, as is warranted, in accordance with law, within a further period of four weeks thereafter.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. _____________ S. V. BHATT, J Dt: 25.10.2017 Prv

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION NO.35324 of 2017 25-10-2017 Prv