Shaik Mahaboob Basha v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.By Its Principal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * WRIT PETITION No.2538 of 2016 BETWEEN Shaik Mahaboob.

... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ...RESPONDENTS DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 03.02.2016 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR 1.

Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

No 2.

Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

No 3.

Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

No

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by orders of this Court in W.P.No.24316 of 2013 and batch dated 05.09.2013 as well as W.P.No.4595 of 2015 and batch dated 04.03.2015. Following the same, this writ petition is allowed. There shall be consequential direction to the Sub-Registrar, Podili, to receive and process the documents presented by the petitioners in respect of the subject lands without reference to the order dated 15.03.2011 of the High Court of Madras in Contempt Petition No.1205 of 2010.

In the event the documents presented are found to fulfil the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, the SubRegistrar, Podili, shall complete the registration formalities and release the documents in accordance with the due procedure. As a sequel the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J February 3, 2016 DSK