Uppada Prasad Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W .P.No.4 1 5 7 4 of 2 0 1 8 ORDER: - When the matter is taken up, the written instructions furnished by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Chityal PS, Nalgonda District, dated 16.11.2018, are placed on record by the learned Government Pleader. The said instructions read as under: - "It is submitted that as per the station records, as of now, no criminal cases are pending against the petitioners herein on the file of the respondent No.6 Sub-Inspector of Police, Chityal Police Station, Nalgonda District.

It is submitted that the petitioner contended that the respondent No.6 Sub-Inspector of Police, Chityal Police Station, Nalgonda District harassed and threatened the petitioners to implicate them in false cases by calling them to the Police Station is incorrect, baseless, far from truth and has been invented for the sake of filing the present Writ Petition. It is submitted that the 6th respondent did not harass, threaten or summon the petitioners at any point of time.

It is incorrect to say that since one week, the 6th respondent called the petitioners to the Police Station and threatened to settle the alleged issue with one Hari Shankar, hence denied. It is submitted that the 6th respondent did not summon nor the petitioners approach the 6th respondent Police Station on 14.11.2018 as alleged by them. It is also incorrect to say that the 6th respondent obtained signatures of the petitioners on some papers, hence denied.

It is submitted that the contentions of the petitioners against the respondent No.6 are incorrect and baseless."

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, by placing on record the said instructions furnished by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Chityal Police Station, Nalgonda District, dated 16.11.2018.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ A.V.Sesh a Sai, J Date: 19.11.2018 smr