Ali Bin Mohd.Bin Zakin And 3 Others v. P Laxman And Another
[ 3385 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT No: 989 ot 2017 Appeal under Section 96 of CPC., aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dated 22-03-2017 in OS No.10 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge Mahabubnagar.
Between:
1. Ali Bin Mohd.Bin Zakin, S/o Mohd. Been Abdullah Bin Zakin, Aged about 80 years, Occ Business, R/o.H.No.1-8-20, Nalbowil Street, Near Fire Station, Mahabubnagar Through GPA Appellant no.2.
2. Abdullah Abur Raheen Bin Zakir @ Abbu Jani, Sio Abur Raheem Ahmed Bin Lakin, Aged about 66 years, Occ Buslness, Ryo H.No.'l-4-113, New Town, Mahabubnagar (GPA Holder of appellant no-1 )
3. Mohd Maqbool Ahmed, S/o Ahmed, Aged about 44years, Occ Real Estate Business, H.No.2-12, Dr. Abdul Khalam Nagar, Mahabubnagar.
4. Ahmed Ali, S/o Sadiq Ali, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Business, Sana Furniture Waqf Complex, Raichur Road, Mahabubnagar ...Appellant's/Defendant No.1,2 & 4,5 AND
1. P. Laxman, S/o Vashya, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Psychologist, BASE Educational and Welfare TNGOs Complex,. Station Road, Mahabubnagar.
...Respondent
2. Khadri Sab, S/o Not Known, Age 59 Years, Oc,c: Business & Political Leader, H No.1-5-36/1 , Riyaz Mandir, New Town, Mahabub Nagar (R-2 not necessary party) ...RespondenUDefendant No.3 l.A" NO: 1 OF 2017(AS P.NO:2444 OF 2017) Petition under S€ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Judgment and decree dated 22-03-2017 passed in
o'S No.10 0f 2011 0n the fire of the Hon'bre I Additional District Judge at Mahabunagar, Pending disposal of the above Rppeal to meet the ends of Justice in the interest of Justice ii Counsel for the Appellants: SRI APARNA KOTHAM (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent: SRI CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT IIIt t II ) i 'I ( t ,
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT No.989 of 2OL7
JUDGMENT
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant on 24.Oa.2023, 08.O9.2023 and O6.10.2023. Despite listing the matter under the caption for dismissal', even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for nonprosecution. There sha,ll be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Appeal Suit shall stald closed.
SDI K.SAILESHI DEPUTY RE ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION O FICER To, 't . The ll Additional District Judge Mahabubnagar.
2. One CC to SRI APARNA KOTHAM Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRI CHALLA SR1NIVASA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies It kam N5lilt"- i!
, HIGH COURT '4 i!:fa !l ,'| DATED:1711112023 r i i ;it Itt !
) i $,l 1t\e SrAr€:
JUDGMENT
AS.No.989 ot 2017 J o o .\'
t * 2 3 l[!{ ?02[ * CESPATC i ;
i II I{ ,.
i,,t THIS APPEAL SUIT !S DISMISSED .FOR NON-PROSECUTION II i l'
t 2\ \ +