Sri Raj Kumar Goud v. Smt.Sapna

rN rHE HrcH ""rTf3,lJffisrArE oF TELANGANA *uo'

1'#S I"'&t i,ill1iHi,?A[".I;.8 R uA R y r THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PRESE A.VENKATESHWAR NT A REDDY L EVIS'O PETIT NO o Petition under Article 227 0/2017 in lA No.1690 of 20 of Constitution of ,ndia. aggrieved I ily Court, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad 16/1 by the 016", Ou,u, oI the Court of the 7 in Op Na.1Z24 of ZO17 Fam on the file Between:

I 3[R5# ilf "xi; ii".";1 g,"x,;1^ All concerned AND ,..PETITIONERS NO.1 & 2 ...RESPONDENT 8 I 01 7 petition under Section the arridav* r,", *;;;;, ;1u,1."'' "0"

pravins that in the CR P i.e., Famiry courr, city ",",,".:

1':f court mav;.;"; ;::r:ilt:ilTl;

rired under se*io; ;;;;;:"'

Hvderabad ro take up the J u tr,4a rri a s e ^ " r, ;";^];

" i::; r: :,ff .,:_:::,, For the petitioners : SRI B.CHANDRASEN REDDy, Advocate For the Respondent : NONE APPEARED The Court made the fo owing: ORDER

CE A' VENI{ATESITWAR} REDDY RI JUSTI HON,BLE I slON oN N o,636 OF ElvlL \Iho subrnitted ORDER:

Heard lt rroed counsel for the petitioners'

O.P.No 1224 has become llfrt-lctuous that the matte icatlon o[ the case status information'

Civil Court'

2.

On ver'

the file o{ the Pamil)' Court' Ciu of 2017 on ras allowed on 29 03 2018 itseli HYderabad'

the sarne, this Civi\ Reviston Petrtion is crismissed 3.

ln vie v oI There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneotls as infructu )us'

, pendrng in this Civil Revision i)etir-krn shali stand Petitions, i any ciosed.

I/TRUE COPY/I "' is{l!YilliREtE?R?[ SECTION OFFICER '" ; lL?'i3' 3 5;E:B^:?tT;g[-"ff "iX"#IJt3'ff ."i

3. Two CD )oPies

4. One SP. 'e coPY Ki,k

HIGH COURT OAIEOt16l021202 .,, '.--,] 1t{fiB?02?'

ORDER

CRP.No.6363 of 017 I DISMISSING THI CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS , WITHOUT COST ;.

7s a7