Dr. Eunice Lalnunmawii Chawngthu v. The Government Of Telangana

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT APPEAL Nos.291 and 292 OF 2016 DATED: 28.04.2016 WRIT APPEAL No.291 OF 2016 Between:

Dr. Eunice Lalnunmawii Chawngthu ... Appellant and The State of Telangana and others ... Respondents

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT APPEAL Nos.291 and 292 of 2016 PC: (per the Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) We have heard Ms. B.Rachana, learned advocate, appointed by this Court vide order, dated 26.04.2016 to appear on behalf of the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.

These appeals are directed against the order, dated 21.03.2016 in WPMP.Nos.4212 and 4376 of 2016. We have perused the prayers made in these applications and the impugned order. Though we do not find any reason to interfere with the order impugned in the appeals, having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of Ms. B.Rachana, learned counsel, that this could be a case of racial discrimination and that there is a threat to the life of the petitioner, we dispose of these appeals with the following observations: "It is open to the petitioner to make an application/representation to the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad for appropriate relief.

We request the Commissioner of Police to look into her representation

personally and entrust her case either to Station House Officer, Banjara Hills Police Station or any other responsible officer as he deems fit and proper, to find out whether any criminal case is made out by her against any person and that whether she requires police protection, and take appropriate action within a period of one week from the date of her application.

Insofar as her prayer for putting her back in the disputed premises is concerned, it is open for her to take appropriate remedy.

With these observations, both the Writ Appeals are disposed of.

We place on record a word of appreciation for the services rendered by Ms. B.Rachana, learned counsel, to the petitioner.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.

________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ 28th APRIL, 2016.

_________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J kvni