Tangirala Ranjith Kumar v. Tangirala Susmitha

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 5455 OF 2017 Petition under Nltcle 227 of Conslitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 3010812017 in lA No.B36 of 2017 in FCoP No.54 of 2016 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court -cum- Vl Additional District Judge, Khammam. Between:

Tangirala Ranjith Kumar, S/o. Raja Rao @ Ivoses ,..PETITIONERiRESPONDENT/PETITIONER AND Tangirala Susmitha, Wo. Tangirala Ranjith Kumar ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERYRESPONDENT For the Petitioner : SRI B.SHIVA KUMAR, Advocate (Not present) For the Respondent : SRI J.P.SRIKANTH, Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLT SRI JUSTICEA. VENKATESHWARA REDDY CMI REVISION PETITION No.5455 OF 2017 ORDER:

Learned ;ounsel for the petitioner is called absent. There is no representati >n for him.

2.

As per tl re case status information, F.C.O.P.No.54 of 2O16 was dismissed on 18.O5.2018 itself. Hence, the presence or representation on behalf of the petitioner is felt essential as the Civil Revision 'etition is filed against the orders in I.A.No.836 of 2Ol7 in F.C.O.r'.No.54 of 2O16.

3.

Accordin 1ly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 'here shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if an' , pending in this Civil Revision Pgtition shall stand closed.

Sd/-K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c\,,.

SECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPY'

To

1. The Judge, Famil I Court -cum- Vl Additional District Judge' Khammam' z. O"" CCi"'Sri B.f hiva Kumar, Advocalg(oP^t]C) a. on; cc to sti J.F .srikanth, Advocate (oPUc)

4. Two CD CoPies

5. One S Kj.

re Copy

HIGH COURT DATED:2810112022 1BE STAf5 o \ / I li 231182022 ii ." , .'/

ORDER

CRP.No.5455 ot2017 DISMISSED AS INFRL CTUOUS.

b I