Akula Kishna v. State Of Ap.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.R.C. No.48 of 2016 ORDER :

The petitioner preferred the present Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the order dated 20-11-2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.354 of 2015 in C.C.No.17 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. Heard and perused.

3. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner confined his argument and prayed to dispense with the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and as the question of identity of the accused does not arise, the presence of the petitioner is dispensed with before the trial Court, except on the dates on which the trial Judge insists for his appearance.

5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

6. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this revision, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 06th January, 2016 skmr