B. Nagamani v. State Of Telangana,

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITroN No.17483 0F 2016 Between:

B. Naoamani. Wo B. Prahlad, Aqed 54 years, Occ: Housewife, Fi'/o H'No'16-2lSliltTeie. konark Tower Apartmeits, Modsarambagh, Near Gaddiannaram Cross Roads, Asmangadh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

..,PETITIONER AND State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. The Dy.Collector & Tahsildar, Hayatnagar Mandal, R.R. District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ or direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned order dated 25.3.2015 issued by the 3rd respondent in proceedings No. C/33/2015/6 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the impugned order dated 253.2015 passed in proceedings No. C/33/2015/6 by the 3rd respondent'

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 21489 OF 2016) Petition under Section i sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue interim directions by duly suspending the impugned order dated 2s.3.201s passed in proceedings No. c/33/20'l 5/6 issued by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J.T. SHIVA SHESHU REPRESENTING SRI RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

'"i..:

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.17483 of 2016 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri J.T.Shiva Sheshu, learned counsel representing Sri Raja Gopallavan Tayi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

2.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed sD/- P.cr1! ru+fff HESilltHiA //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 'O,,,. ON" CC tO SRI RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI' AdVOCAIE IOPUCI ' IVS"rtBi'ioSi "'

Revenue' High court ror the state or Telansana at

3. Two CD CoPies MP GJP$Jr

HIGH COURT DATED:2311112023 IE STATF 3 15 0EC 2023 cl :. !

4) -t * DE s PAl ct^(.C

ORDER

WP.No.17483 of 2016 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS \