Gone Nikhitha , Sirisala Rajani v. Gone Naveen Kumar

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date: 22.12.2017 CRP No.5544 of 2017:

Between:

Smt. Gone Nikhitha @ Sirisala Rajani, W/o. Gone Naveen Kumar, D/o.Venkateswarlu, Saraswathinagar, Gopalpur Road, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal district.

.....Petitioner/ Respondent and Gone Naveen Rao S/o Venkatram Narsaiah, Age 35 years, Occu: Employee in BSNL, R/o. H.No.11-22-636, Kashibugga, Warangal City.

.....Respondent/ Petitioner The Court made the following:

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO COMMON ORDER:

Heard Smt. D.Padmavathi, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri J.Venkateswara Reddy, learned counsel for respondent in both revision petitions.

2.

I.A.Nos.128 and 129 of 2017 are filed by petitioner in F.C.O.P.No.59 of 2012. I.A.No.128 of 2017 is filed to reopen the Original Petition to enable him to file application for obtaining sample writings. I.A.No.129 of 2017 is filed praying to obtain sample writings of respondent.

3.

Shorn of details, suffice to note that earlier the respondent herein filed CRP Nos.2903 and 3047 of 2017, aggrieved by the orders in the very same I.As. Said revisions were disposed of by setting aside the orders passed by the Family Court and remanding the matters for consideration of IAs afresh after hearing both sides and to pass a reasoned order. On remand, the Family Court passed orders on 22.09.2017 in I.A.No.128 of 2017 and on 25.09.2017 in I.A.No.129 of 2017, against which these revisions are filed.

4.

A bare perusal of order in I.A.No.128 of 2017 would show that no reasons are assigned in allowing the I.A., except extracting the order passed by this Court in CRPs mentioned above and a laconic order was passed. The order in I.A.No.129 of 2017 is consequent to the order in I.A.No.128 of 2017.

5.

As the orders under challenge are bereft of reasons, Court is constrained to set aside the same and remand the IAs for consideration afresh after hearing both sides and by a reasoned order. It is hoped and expected that the trial Court should pay due attention to the issues agitated by respective parties and pass appropriate order as warranted by law by assigning due reasons. 6.

Civil Revision Petitions are allowed accordingly. Having regard to the history of the litigation, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the IAs, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these revision petitions shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date: 22.12.2017 kkm

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date: 22.12.2017 kkm