G Madhukar, Hyderabad v. G Seetha , Swetha, Hyderabad

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN I.A.No.1 of 2022 In/and FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.403 of 2017 JUDGMENT : (Per ARR, J) Both the parties are present. The appellant/husband has been identified by his counsel, whereas, the respondent/wife herself is a practicing Advocate.

2.

Both the parties have filed I.A.No.1 of 2022 along with Memorandum of Understanding, dated 06.01.2022, containing the terms and conditions of compromise. Both parties admit that they have settled the matter amicably and prayed for grant of divorce by mutual consent. The respondent-wife states she has received the permanent alimony of Rs.15,00,000/-. She has also handed over the keys of the property belonging to the appellant and states that she has no objection for recording the compromise and also for allowing the appeal by grant of divorce by mutual consent.

ARR, J & ML, J F.C.A.No.403 of 2017 3.

In view of the same, as the parties intend to compromise the matter, I.A.No.1 of 2022 is allowed and the Appeal is also allowed in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding, dated 06.01.2022 entered between the parties. The terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding shall form part of the decree. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J.

________________________ M. LAXMAN, J.

Date: 02.03.2022 ajr