← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/44005/2018dismissed no costs

Goluguri Krishna Reddy v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

2018-12-21P Naveen Rao3 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.44005 OF 2018 DATED :21.12.2018 Between :

Goluguri Krishna Reddy, S/o.China Sati Raju, Aged about 64 yrs, R/o.9-25, Subba Rayudu Veedhi, Pandalapaka Village, Biccavolu Mandal, East Godavari District & another.

..

Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Velagapudi-522237, Tulluru Mandal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh & others.

.. Respondents This court made the following :

- 2 - THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.44005 OF 2018 ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj for respondents 1 to 4 and Sri K.K.Durga Prasad, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.5.

2.

Petitioners claim to be the residents of Pandalapaka Village, Biccavolu Mandal, East Godavari District. Petitioners allege that respondents are initiating steps to construct Anganwadi Centre, on the bund of public tank i.e., Uurva Cheruvu in R.S.No.251, and such proposal to construct Anganwadi Centre, is without following the due procedure, without there being a resolution by the Gram Panchayat and such construction may cause danger to the children as the Centre is proposed to be located on the Bund. 3.

Learned Standing counsel, on instructions, submits that no decision is taken to locate Anganwadi Centre. Five places were identified including the said premises. But so far no final decision is taken by the Gram Panchayat. Unless and until a decision is taken by the Gram Panchayat, further steps will not be taken for construction of Anganwadi Centre. 4.

The instructions furnished to learned Standing counsel, as noted above, would show that even before a decision is taken, and only on apprehension, this writ petition is filed.

- 3 - 5.

Thus, leaving it open to the petitioners, to work out their remedies, after a decision is taken, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. __________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 21st December, 2018 Rds